🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.