🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.